Last Seen Movie - The Latest Movie You Have Seen; ratings

User avatar
Eric
Tenured
Posts: 2749
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by Eric »

Typically it's because someone is delighted by it that someone else is compelled to say "this is the worst thing I've ever seen in my life."
dreaMaker
Assistant
Posts: 596
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:41 pm

Post by dreaMaker »

It is always very interesting to me when i see how differently people may react to something, or how a person, a film fan, can be totally delighted and amazed by seeing a movie and the other person, a film fan too, would say ''This is the worst thing i've ever seen in my life''.



Edited By dreaMaker on 1253052583
User avatar
Eric
Tenured
Posts: 2749
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 11:18 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:

Post by Eric »

Eyes Wide Shut, Barry Lyndon and The Shining will always be the trilogy of great Kubrick for me.
mlrg
Associate
Posts: 1770
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:19 am
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Post by mlrg »

Reza wrote:
Damien wrote:
Greg wrote: You really don't consider Paths Of Glory, Dr. Strangelove, or 2001 to be great films?
Ummm, no.
LOL
but Barry Lyndon is!
Reza
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10216
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 11:14 am
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan

Post by Reza »

Damien wrote:
Greg wrote:
Damien wrote:And as things worked out, Kubrick's last movie was his one great film.
You really don't consider Paths Of Glory, Dr. Strangelove, or 2001 to be great films?
Ummm, no.
LOL
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

Greg wrote:
Damien wrote:And as things worked out, Kubrick's last movie was his one great film.
You really don't consider Paths Of Glory, Dr. Strangelove, or 2001 to be great films?
Ummm, no.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Reza
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10216
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 11:14 am
Location: Islamabad, Pakistan

Post by Reza »

Cheri (Stephen Frears, 2009) 3/10

What crap. Lovely costumes which should get a nod. Rupert Friend is such an insipid leading man. Kathy Bates is amusing.....but the film is another misfire for Michelle Pfeiffer on her quest for an Oscar..




Edited By Reza on 1253033083
anonymous1980
Laureate
Posts: 6420
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 10:03 pm
Location: Manila
Contact:

Post by anonymous1980 »

Near Dark (Kathryn Bigelow) - 9/10

Easily better than The Lost Boys.
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

Watched Phoebe in Wonderland last night.

It was a bit uneven, trying to be too many things at once, but it has firmed up my belief that Elle Fanning is the true talent of the Fanning Family. She is incredibly natural and enchanting. She certainly made up for many of the movie's failures. Patricia Clarkson was also nicely used in the film, though Bill Pullman was awful and Felicity Huffman was severely disappointing.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 11075
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

I think Kubrick is a pretty great director but A.I. (while being the best film of Spielberg's career, albeit one with a too bluntly-realized brilliant ending) is better than quite a few of his films.
"How's the despair?"
Zahveed
Associate
Posts: 1838
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: In Your Head
Contact:

Post by Zahveed »

Greg wrote:
Damien wrote:And as things worked out, Kubrick's last movie was his one great film.
You really don't consider Paths Of Glory, Dr. Strangelove, or 2001 to be great films?
or A Clockwork Orange for that matter.
"It's the least most of us can do, but less of us will do more."
Zahveed
Associate
Posts: 1838
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: In Your Head
Contact:

Post by Zahveed »

I think it would have been good, but it wouldn't be the polished film we have today. It's not nearly as mainstream as Spielberg could have made it though, and that's a good thing. There would probably be a lot more silence or classical music in Kubrick's version too.

Just generalizing.
"It's the least most of us can do, but less of us will do more."
Greg
Tenured
Posts: 3359
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Post by Greg »

Damien wrote:And as things worked out, Kubrick's last movie was his one great film.
You really don't consider Paths Of Glory, Dr. Strangelove, or 2001 to be great films?
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

It's a near perfect movie, so a Kubrick version would not have been as good.

And as things worked out, Kubrick's last movie was his one great film.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

Easily better.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply

Return to “Other Film Discussions”