Page 1 of 1
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 11:06 pm
by Sonic Youth
But don't take my word for it.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:34 pm
by Okri
Oh, it's a futile hope.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:31 pm
by Sonic Youth
Yeah, but I think it needed more for Best Picture. More obstacles to clear, being a foreign language film.
Two Oscars is no disgrace, though. And the night isn't over yet. I could be wrong. We'll see.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:28 pm
by Okri
The screenplay win means we still live in hope.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:27 pm
by Sonic Youth
One thing's for sure. I thought 1917s early losses may have been evidence of weakness. But if Parasite couldn't prevail here or Production Design (where it had a legit shot), then Parasite fans may as well turn in early.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:19 pm
by rolotomasi99
Sonic Youth wrote:rolotomasi99 wrote:Not unworthy but just so predictable.
Was it, though? A lot of people here apparently predicted Parasite.
Yes, I was one of them but it was more wishful thinking. The most editing once again wins the Oscar.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 10:05 pm
by Sonic Youth
rolotomasi99 wrote:Not unworthy but just so predictable.
Was it, though? A lot of people here apparently predicted Parasite.
Re: 92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:57 pm
by rolotomasi99
Not unworthy but just so predictable.
92nd Oscars: Film Editing
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:56 pm
by OscarGuy
Ford v Ferrari