Campaign 2020

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16787
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Big Magilla » Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:38 pm

Sabin wrote:Joe Biden.
At the end of the debate, I was like "Give me Biden, I can't deal with this." I can't be the only one. During a debate where we should have been talking about Biden's differences of opinion with the rest of the stage on Iran, his Iraq vote, trade, impeachment, and (I don't know) when he publicly said "Hillary faced sexism but that won't be a problem with me!"... he just sort of cruised through, didn't he? That's very convenient for him. So, let's prepare for the Presidency of Joe Biden, which will be marked by a reversal of Donald Trump's policies, a public option, some maternity leave and immigration reform, lousy trade deals, a mix of foreign unity and military blunders, hopefully some climate change regulation, a Republican Vice President, and of course reaching across the aisle which proved so popular we lost 1000 seats.


No Republican Vice President. I know he said he was open to the idea but someone needs to disabuse him of that and fast. At his age, his health could deteriorate overnight forcing him to resign. We need another Democrat to take over, not another fucking Republican. He can reach across the aisle all he wants - if we maintain the majority in the House and recapture it in the Senate it won't matter. Also, if the Dems do control Congress they likely will be a more Progressive group that will get Biden to entertain more Progressive ideas as he goes along.

User avatar
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2788
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby criddic3 » Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm

Sabin wrote:
3. CNN.
That debate was fucking ridiculous. There's right-wing framing and then there's whatever that was. "How are you going to keep your policies from bankrupting the country?"


On the other hand, these are the exact kinds of questions a Bernie Sanders, or for that matter Elizabeth Warren, would encounter on the general election campaign trail. We have to remember that this all leads to an actual confrontation with incumbent President Trump. So just asking questions that are comfortable for the Democratic base is not enough at this point. The first votes will be cast in just a few weeks, so this is now a real question of who actually becomes the nominee. This is my first election as a newly minted Democrat (following 23 years as a Republican), so I'm very aware that Donald Trump can win this election if we choose the wrong candidate here. We have to keep that in mind.
"Corrupting an election to keep oneself in office is perhaps the most abusive and destructive violation of one’s oath of office that I can imagine." -- Senator Mitt Romney, 2/05/2020

Sabin
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8174
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Sabin » Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:33 pm

The National Review shared a tweet from a Senate aide who said: "this s*** is hilarious because it sounds like both something Bernie would say and Elizabeth Warren would make up."

This has been a very sad day for me as a Democrat. This "battle of the sexes nonsense" proves that something I think it's kind of a stupid distraction can also be incredibly nuanced and worthwhile. And a giant mess.

FIVE POINTS:
1. Bernie Sanders.
I have no difficulty imagining that he said something like that. I don't think he said "I don't think a woman can defeat Trump" but considering the stupid "30 years" remark he made, the guy puts his foot in his mouth a lot, so maybe he did. I think he could have added more empathy to what he said overall. Two weeks into the near year and "Front-Runner Sanders" survived a landmine by absorbing most of the blast. Considering he doesn't have the support of a political machine (besides his own) to help him on the road to November 9th, that doesn't bode well.

2. Sanders' supporters.
Sanders needs to tell them to refrain from sexist/misogynistic berating of Warren supporters on social media NOW. If he doesn't, it is inconceivable that he could unify the party if he becomes the nominee (which likely will not happen). They are being awful, awful, awful.

3. CNN.
That debate was fucking ridiculous. There's right-wing framing and then there's whatever that was. "How are you going to keep your policies from bankrupting the country?" I believe that one of the reason Sanders' supporters were so furious at Warren was because they were so amped by that awful debate -- WHICH IS NO EXCUSE.

4. Elizabeth Warren.
I've expended a great deal of time and energy thinking about her this week. I just hate that she did this. Because it's not helping her and it's not helping "her friend" (the person whose policies she aligns the most with). This week, she pushed the limits of allyship more than I thought possible. This was a political move and it's backfiring against her spectacularly. This is not the case of a woman only summoning the strength to come forward now to speak truth. We're not talking about sexual assault or harassment. If she can only summon the strength to talk about this now, then she can't be President. This is a knife, pure and simple. The only conceivable out I can give her is that she didn't know about the leak, which CNN has all-but confirmed that she leaked it. If it comes out that she didn't know, then I will donate to her already-failed campaign out of fealty. After all, I am her demographic: college educated, white, not-affluent but of means, and certainly there to vote for whoever the Democrats nominate in the general. How offensive.

5. Joe Biden.
At the end of the debate, I was like "Give me Biden, I can't deal with this." I can't be the only one. During a debate where we should have been talking about Biden's differences of opinion with the rest of the stage on Iran, his Iraq vote, trade, impeachment, and (I don't know) when he publicly said "Hillary faced sexism but that won't be a problem with me!"... he just sort of cruised through, didn't he? That's very convenient for him. So, let's prepare for the Presidency of Joe Biden, which will be marked by a reversal of Donald Trump's policies, a public option, some maternity leave and immigration reform, lousy trade deals, a mix of foreign unity and military blunders, hopefully some climate change regulation, a Republican Vice President, and of course reaching across the aisle which proved so popular we lost 1000 seats. If there is a silver lining, it's that having such a gaffe-prone, self-evolution resistant narcissist in office will make The Left chill on social justice crusading juuuust a little bit if it means political survival. As it is, I fear for the deep schisms in The Democratic Party as half embraces corporate-friendly virtue signaling while the other swears by identity-blind economic progressivism as we await whatever Post-Trump Republican Party sweeps the 2022 midterms.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough." ~ FDR

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16787
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Big Magilla » Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:27 am

I don't like CNN's talking heads. I prefer MSNBC's for analysis and turned to them immediately following the debate.

I never heard of this Abby Phillip before. Clearly she was someone with an agenda as were Wolf Blitzer and the Des Moines Register reporter who I never heard of before either. All their questions were designed to start a fight between the candidates. When they didn't take the bait, they were called dull in their responses by the media and not just on CNN.

The battle of the sexes nonsense between Sanders and Warren was not handled by anyone very well. Sanders should have said "if I said anything of the sort it must have been in a context I don't remember. That's not something I've ever believed and wouldn't have said in such an emphatic manner" or something like that rather than "I never said it." Warren should have dropped it instead of going on about it. She did have a moment, though, when she said she and Klobuchar were the only ones to have won an election against an incumbent Republican in thirty years. Technically, however, she was wrong. Sanders, as he pointed out did it 1990 which she claimed was outside the 30-year margin. It would have been had the 1990 election been held prior to January 14th, but it wasn't, it was held in November which was within 30 years.

Personally I prefer Warren to Sanders but her gaffes are worse than Biden's.

Greg
Tenured
Posts: 2892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Greg » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:24 pm

CNN’s Debate Performance Was Villainous and Shameful:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... en-938365/
"Let's be honest, the federal government has a printing press in their basement. When they have the political will, they find the money."

Andrew Cuomo

User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 12874
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby OscarGuy » Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:25 pm

Warren 14
Buttigieg/Yang/Steyer 11
Klobuchar/Sanders 10
Bloomberg 8
Biden 7
Gabbard 6
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin

danfrank
Temp
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:19 pm
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby danfrank » Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:45 am

Warren clobbered everybody else in this test for me. I’ve never been undecided in a presidential race so close to an election (California’s is on Super Tuesday this year). Typically in the primary I vote for the person who most closely matches me ideologically, but never has the electability factor been so crucial. The polls right now seem to indicate that Warren is slightly less electable than some of the other candidates. So I’m torn. What would be ideal is a charismatic candidate who’s is a little on the progressive side of moderate, with tough skin and some fighting chops. I’m having trouble finding that candidate.

User avatar
Precious Doll
Emeritus
Posts: 4320
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 2:20 am
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Precious Doll » Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:13 am

Interesting survey. I got Yang 12, Warren 11, Buttigieg 10, Bloomberg, Klobuchar & Steyer all 9.

My partner got Bloomberg 16, Biden 15, Steyer 14, Klobuchar 13, Bittugueg 11 and Yang on 10.

We both had Sanders last.
"I want cement covering every blade of grass in this nation! Don't we taxpayers have a voice anymore?" Peggy Gravel (Mink Stole) in John Waters' Desperate Living (1977)

Heksagon
Adjunct
Posts: 1188
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 10:39 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Heksagon » Thu Jan 16, 2020 3:47 am

I'm always curious about doing these political "who agreed with you" tests even if I don't take them very seriously and even when it's not an election that directly concerns me. My top were Bloomberg at 11 followed by Biden and Klobuchar at 10.

I feel a lot of the questions to be unimportant or more complex than what can be answered with the multiple-choice answers that the quiz offers. If I removed those, it left eight questions, and Biden, Bloomberg, Klobuchar, Steyer and Yang all agreed with me on five.

But even of those questions many were such that the candidate's ability to influence those would be minor even if elected. IMHO, the two most important questions there - especially from an international point of view, and considering the president's ability to influence them - are whether they would commit to reducing national debt and joining TPP and only Biden and Bloomberg would agree with me that those both should be done.

Sabin
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8174
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Sabin » Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:21 am

I got Warren at 16, Sanders and Steyer at 14, Gabbard at 11, Buttigieg and Klobuchar at 10, and Biden and Bloomberg at 8.

So... I like these guys.
Last edited by Sabin on Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough." ~ FDR

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16787
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Big Magilla » Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:42 pm

I got Klobuchar and Steyer at 14, followed by Buttigieg at 13, Blumberg at 12, Biden at 11, Warren and Yang at 10 and Sanders and Gabbard at 6.

Okri
Tenured
Posts: 2784
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:28 pm
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Okri » Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:16 pm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... s-with-me/

Which Democratic Candidate do you agree with the most? In a surprise, my top two were Warren and Steyer (15/20). Warren ekes out ahead if I remove the two questions I really felt unqualified to answer.

Biden was in last.

Sabin
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8174
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Sabin » Tue Dec 03, 2019 10:18 pm

Big Magilla wrote
So much going on in politics today that this news hardly makes a blip.

My theory is that people are sick of all the noise with Trump in our faces all day every day.

They (we?) want someone who will just get the job done which is something that both Biden and Mayor Pete project. Harris was there until she made a spectacle of herself going after Biden on school busing in the 70s, something no one else cares about.

Bernie and Warren still have their supporters, but neither one seems to be picking up anyone new.

Harris and Booker are strong possible VP candidates.

I'm pretty much tuning out impeachment talk. Wake me up when 20 Republican senators turn on him.

But I don't know if I agree with you that nobody cares about Joe Biden's history with race relations. I'm certainly bothered by it -- or rather, I'm bothered by the fact that he refuses to admit that he ever did anything wrong. No matter what he's does in the past, he never says "Yeah, I screwed up." We already have a President like that. I'm planning on being on this planet for a long time. There are a lot of problems in this country. I want a President who at least acknowledges them and wants to combat them for change. For all her flaws, Kamala Harris did that and the response I hear from a lot of people is "I'd like it quieter than it is right now." Well, I personally don't.

I never thought we'd counter a right-wing MAGA campaign with a left-leaning MAGA campaign for the sake of how it makes us feel.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough." ~ FDR

Big Magilla
Site Admin
Posts: 16787
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:22 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Big Magilla » Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:14 pm

So much going on in politics today that this news hardly makes a blip.

My theory is that people are sick of all the noise with Trump in our faces all day every day.

They (we?) want someone who will just get the job done which is something that both Biden and Mayor Pete project. Harris was there until she made a spectacle of herself going after Biden on school busing in the 70s, something no one else cares about.

Bernie and Warren still have their supporters, but neither one seems to be picking up anyone new.

Harris and Booker are strong possible VP candidates.

Sabin
Tenured Laureate
Posts: 8174
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: Campaign 2020

Postby Sabin » Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:30 pm

Kamala Harris drops out of the race.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.politi ... ace-074902

Everyone is writing their own moratoriums on Sen. Harris' campaign and why it did not succeed. My reasoning is simple. During a primary, the race reveals itself. This race is clearly "Moderates vs. Progressives." One group (Biden, Buttigieg) wants a Post-Trump nation to look like a Pre-Trump nation, the other (Sanders, Warren) wants a Post-Trump nation to change and look fundamentally different. Kamala Harris ran as a Prosecutor, prosecuting Trump, prosecuting misogyny, prosecuting racism. And she wasn't alone. Kristen Gillibrand did this. Cory Booker and Julian Castro are still doing it. And it turns out there wasn't really room for a third lane. The "Prosecution Lane" got shouldered out of the race. There are A LOT of reasons why, but her lane completely disappeared live on TV before our eyes, and once your lane is gone, that's it.

A good President does two things. They move the country forward and they make government work. This sounds simple but it's a herculean task. Regardless of one's political ideology, history shines a light on those who rise to this occasion. There are things about Kamala Harris that I do not like but she's consistently been one of the only candidates running who were MAYBE up to this task. She's been one of the few people running who I would want to be my President.
"Human kindness has never weakened the stamina or softened the fiber of a free people. A nation does not have to be cruel to be tough." ~ FDR


Return to “Current Events”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest