Air Force wanted $7.5 Million to develop a Gay Bom

[Penelope]

Wasn't Alexander The Great gay?

Yes, and so was Marshal Lyautey and, probably, Kitchener.

[kaytodd]

.....only something absurd like this to come out of the U.S of A!

Ah, Reza, you are only jealous that scientists in your homeland did not think of this.

Remember the neutron bomb, that would use severe radiation to kill people but leave buildings standing? Johnny Carson had a joke during one of his monologues: "The U.S. Air Force has announced they have deleloped a gay neutron bomb. It kills people but leaves behind the scent of cologne."

I have no idea what that joke means either. But I remember it got a laugh from the audience.

[Greg]

Wasn't Alexander The Great gay?

[Damien]

This sounds like some cheesey comedy from the late 60s/70s, a la The Gay Deceivers and Norman, Is That You?

[Reza]

.....only something absurd like this to come out of the U.S of A!

[Sonic Youth]

Or if the wind is blowing in the wrong direction? Gives new meaning to the word 'blowback'.

I remember this was in the news years ago, pre-9/11 I think. And it got a good laugh on this board.

[Penelope]

But what happens if the bomb were to accidentally go off at a barracks in Oklahoma?

Air Force wanted $7.5 Million to develop a Gay Bomb

Jun 8, 2007 9:03 pm US/Pacific

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsequently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviewing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.

"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed."