New Developments III

User avatar
OscarGuy
Site Admin
Posts: 13668
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 12:22 am
Location: Springfield, MO
Contact:

Post by OscarGuy »

Drilling? Short term solution? You are an idiot. Do you know how long it takes for drilled oil to make it into production? Months, perhaps even years and especially in place that don't already have a drilling operation set up. That would take years and we're not talking just a couple. And most of what we're drilling now goes into the reserve, so it doesn't help the consumer at all. A SHORT term solution is so stop depositing into the reserve to quickly infuse the supply, thus decreasing demand on foreign oil.

And while we're at it, why don't all these oil companies spend the money to increase the production of gas? There hasn't been a new refinery built in the US in over a decade (and it might even be two decades at this point). And it's been several years since existing refineries have been upgraded to increase the amount of gasoline made from one barrel of oil. The technology exists, but we're using decades-old technology for refining oil.

And whether you believe it or not, these record profits from the oil companies could be used to decrease the price of gas. After all, it's the oil companies that determine gas prices.
Wesley Lovell
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." - Benjamin Franklin
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2874
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

cam wrote:How about instead of "drilling here. Now.", the US work on alternative fuels? It is a fact much of North America depends on foreign oil, and they have the upper hand, don't they? (Refer to my previous post re the US losing the war in the long run)
I say we need to do both. Drilling here for the more short term solution and alternative fuels for the long term solution. We can do both.

--

GET READY FOR THE OIL-PRICE DROP
By ALAN REYNOLDS


June 6, 2008 -- THE price of crude oil has jumped as high as $135 lately, up from $87 in early February. The news encouraged some Wall Street analysts to suggest oil might approach $200 before long. In fact, that's quite impossible: The world economy can't handle current energy prices, much less a big increase.
Which in turn means that oil prices will fall.

Market analysts often claim oil prices are almost entirely determined by supply. Demand is said to be insensitive ("inelastic") to price. The standard example is that many Americans have to drive to work and most gas-guzzling SUVs will still be on the road even if the affluent few can trade theirs for a Prius. Whatever the price, we'll pay it.

This idea rests on two fallacies. The first is to exaggerate the United States' importance when it comes to ups and downs in worldwide oil demand. In fact, America is using no more oil than we did in 2004.

The second fallacy is to greatly exaggerate the importance of passenger cars in the United States. It's true that Americans are driving less and buying four-cylinder cars - but that's not where we should be looking for serious "demand destruction."

Two-thirds of petroleum in the United States is used for transportation - but half of the transportation sector's fuel flows into commercial trucks, trains, buses, airplanes and ships. As a result, only 44 percent of each barrel of oil is used to produce gasoline in this country, and some of that gasoline fuels business - delivery vans, landscapers' trucks, fishing boats, industrial and farm machinery, etc.

Most crude oil is used to produce diesel fuel for trucks, ships and trains, heavy fuel oil for industry, aviation fuel, asphalt, home heating oil, propane, wax, and innumerable petrochemical products ranging from detergents and drugs to synthetic fabrics and plastic.

In short, a huge share of crude oil is used to produce and distribute industrial products. That explains why the price of oil is extremely cyclical - that is, it tends to rise during economic booms and fall during contractions. It dropped 44 percent in the last recession (from November 2000 to November 2001), 48 percent from October 1990 to January 1992 - and 71 percent from July 1980 to July 1986.

Oil prices have a huge impact on producers' cost of production - profits and losses - not just on consumers' cost of living.

Firms that can't raise prices will find profit margins squeezed - and will have to cut back on production and jobs. Even if some producers of energy-intensive products can raise prices enough to cover higher energy costs, they'll nonetheless sell fewer of their products because of those higher prices. So they too will have to cut back on production and jobs.

Nine out of 10 previous postwar recessions began shortly after a big spike in the price of oil. Yet those recessions always slashed oil prices dramatically. People who have been predicting both a nasty US recession and $200 oil prices are contradicting themselves.

Recent news reports have expressed surprise that the US economy appears much stronger than the famously gloomy predictions at the start of the year. Indeed, the surprising endurance of US manufacturing and exports is one reason oil prices rose as long as they did.

But note that a US recession isn't required to bring down the price of oil. All that's needed is industrial stagnation or decline in many other countries.

In the United States and Britain, industrial production is nearly flat - only 0.2 percent higher than it was a year ago. In many other countries, however, industrial production has dropped over the past 12 months. It's down by 0.7 percent in Japan, 1.1 percent in Austria, 2.5 percent in Italy and Denmark, 2.9 percent in Canada, 5.4 percent in Greece, 5.7 percent in Singapore and 13.3 percent in Spain.

In April, industrial production also fell in India and China. Shrinking industry around the world shrinks demand for energy in general - and for oil in particular.

When the price of anything gets unbearably high, it discourages demand. The resulting drop in sales, in turn, causes inventories to pile up and the price to come down. That has proven true of overpriced houses - and it will likewise prove true of overpriced oil.

Alan Reynolds is a senior fellow with the Cato Institute and the author of "Income and Wealth."
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
Assistant
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by Johnny Guitar »

I heard that foreign governments were scheming to get our precious bodily fluids ...
cam
Assistant
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Coquitlam BC Canada

Post by cam »

How about instead of "drilling here. Now.", the US work on alternative fuels? It is a fact much of North America depends on foreign oil, and they have the upper hand, don't they? (Refer to my previous post re the US losing the war in the long run)
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2874
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

Yes, I just read the headlines today about the big jump. That is discomforting. We really have to stop getting so much of our fuel outside. We have to drill here. Now.

I may not drive, but I do take taxis many days, and the prices are rising. It still beats putting $20 dollars or more a day into a car, but it's a problem for everyone. Thankfully, I also take the bus, which costs a fraction of all that.
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
Damien
Laureate
Posts: 6331
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 8:43 pm
Location: New York, New York
Contact:

Post by Damien »

criddic3 wrote:On the economy, unemployment is 5%, a very good number and better than the three previous administrations' average.
Many economists now say that we may avoid recession completely, since there has been a slow but sure uptick in growth.
From Reuters;

The 5.5 percent unemployment rate in May, which jumped an unexpected half a percentage point, is the steepest monthly rise in more than two decades.

And from the hardly liberal Forbes:

Perfect Storm For Wall Street Slide
Steve Schaefer, 06.06.08, 12:45 PM ET

Surprise weakness in the May jobs report and skyrocketing oil prices pounded stocks in New York Friday erasing all of Thursday's gains.

The Labor Department reported nonfarm payrolls lost 49,000 jobs last month, after shedding 28,000 jobs in April according to revised figures, but the figure caused barely a ripple compared with the unemployment rate, which jumped to a surprising 5.5%, up from 5.0%. (See: "U.S. Jobs Fall For Fifth Straight Month")

Analysts had expected a mild rise, but the half-point jump caught the market by surprise and dampened enthusiasm before the opening bell, a trend that got worse in a hurry once trading began.

Major selling pressure was compounded by soaring oil prices, which were back near record levels and looming just below the $135 threshold. Crude was at $134.25 a barrel, off its daily high, but still up $6.46 for the session, and 37.4% thus far in 2008.
"Y'know, that's one of the things I like about Mitt Romney. He's been consistent since he changed his mind." -- Christine O'Donnell
Sabin
Laureate Emeritus
Posts: 10747
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 12:52 am
Contact:

Post by Sabin »

His love is real but he is not?
"How's the despair?"
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2874
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

cam wrote:
criddic3 wrote:
cam wrote:You poor man. Who are you listening to? You don't feel the effects othe gas price hike, or the change in the price of food?
You don't read the world news--only that sliver that supports your narrow views? You poor sad man.

No I don't. Admittedly that's because I don't drive. I see that the prices are going up, but there is little that the President or Congress can do about it.

But that is separate from saying we are winning militarily in Iraq. We are. al Qaeda is crushed, based on reports in numerous media outlets and military reports. Violence is down to its lowest since the beginnng of the war.

On the economy, unemployment is 5%, a very good number and better than the three previous administrations' average.
Many economists now say that we may avoid recession completely, since there has been a slow but sure uptick in growth.

So where do you get your info, cam? The talking points of the Democratic Party? Senator Obama? Ever read a newspaper?

People ignore the good stuff, panick when some idiot tells them there will be a huge recession, and doesn't see the truth. Things aren't great, but in reality (despite the feeling of panick) things are not as bad as you would want me to believe.

The facts are clear. The solution is simple yet not so simple. In the short term, we need to drill here for fuel. In the long term, we have to change our source of fuel from oil to something else that's reliable.

On the first solution, Democrats oppose drilling, because they care more about some fictitious polar bear crisis then they do about stopping the gas price problem. We can do it without hurting the environment for animals. On the second solution, there are many suggestions out there, from ethanol to electric cars to wind or solar power. I think that we just need to take a step back and look at things realistically. Not to panick and play the blame-game. Maybe it takes someone who isn't thrust into the middle to see clearly the whole picture.

That's what I thought. You have your head in the sand.
Are you sure you're not a robot?
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
cam
Assistant
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Coquitlam BC Canada

Post by cam »

criddic3 wrote:
cam wrote:You poor man. Who are you listening to? You don't feel the effects othe gas price hike, or the change in the price of food?
You don't read the world news--only that sliver that supports your narrow views? You poor sad man.

No I don't. Admittedly that's because I don't drive. I see that the prices are going up, but there is little that the President or Congress can do about it.

But that is separate from saying we are winning militarily in Iraq. We are. al Qaeda is crushed, based on reports in numerous media outlets and military reports. Violence is down to its lowest since the beginnng of the war.

On the economy, unemployment is 5%, a very good number and better than the three previous administrations' average.
Many economists now say that we may avoid recession completely, since there has been a slow but sure uptick in growth.

So where do you get your info, cam? The talking points of the Democratic Party? Senator Obama? Ever read a newspaper?

People ignore the good stuff, panick when some idiot tells them there will be a huge recession, and doesn't see the truth. Things aren't great, but in reality (despite the feeling of panick) things are not as bad as you would want me to believe.

The facts are clear. The solution is simple yet not so simple. In the short term, we need to drill here for fuel. In the long term, we have to change our source of fuel from oil to something else that's reliable.

On the first solution, Democrats oppose drilling, because they care more about some fictitious polar bear crisis then they do about stopping the gas price problem. We can do it without hurting the environment for animals. On the second solution, there are many suggestions out there, from ethanol to electric cars to wind or solar power. I think that we just need to take a step back and look at things realistically. Not to panick and play the blame-game. Maybe it takes someone who isn't thrust into the middle to see clearly the whole picture.
That's what I thought. You have your head in the sand.
flipp525
Laureate
Posts: 6163
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 7:44 am

Post by flipp525 »

criddic3 wrote:panick
How ironic that you misspelled the word "panic" throughout your entire post.

If I recall correctly, you've mentioned before that you live just at or below the poverty line. What does being a Republican actually do for you, fiscally-speaking?

I'd also like you define what "winning militarily" means.
"The mantle of spinsterhood was definitely in her shoulders. She was twenty five and looked it."

-Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
User avatar
Johnny Guitar
Assistant
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 5:14 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by Johnny Guitar »

:O :D :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

That one was a 9.6. Brilliant. Bravo, author, encore!
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2874
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

cam wrote:You poor man. Who are you listening to? You don't feel the effects othe gas price hike, or the change in the price of food?
You don't read the world news--only that sliver that supports your narrow views? You poor sad man.
No I don't. Admittedly that's because I don't drive. I see that the prices are going up, but there is little that the President or Congress can do about it.

But that is separate from saying we are winning militarily in Iraq. We are. al Qaeda is crushed, based on reports in numerous media outlets and military reports. Violence is down to its lowest since the beginnng of the war.

On the economy, unemployment is 5%, a very good number and better than the three previous administrations' average.
Many economists now say that we may avoid recession completely, since there has been a slow but sure uptick in growth.

So where do you get your info, cam? The talking points of the Democratic Party? Senator Obama? Ever read a newspaper?

People ignore the good stuff, panick when some idiot tells them there will be a huge recession, and doesn't see the truth. Things aren't great, but in reality (despite the feeling of panick) things are not as bad as you would want me to believe.

The facts are clear. The solution is simple yet not so simple. In the short term, we need to drill here for fuel. In the long term, we have to change our source of fuel from oil to something else that's reliable.

On the first solution, Democrats oppose drilling, because they care more about some fictitious polar bear crisis then they do about stopping the gas price problem. We can do it without hurting the environment for animals. On the second solution, there are many suggestions out there, from ethanol to electric cars to wind or solar power. I think that we just need to take a step back and look at things realistically. Not to panick and play the blame-game. Maybe it takes someone who isn't thrust into the middle to see clearly the whole picture.
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
cam
Assistant
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Coquitlam BC Canada

Post by cam »

You poor man. Who are you listening to? You don't feel the effects othe gas price hike, or the change in the price of food?
You don't read the world news--only that sliver that supports your narrow views? You poor sad man.
criddic3
Tenured
Posts: 2874
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 11:08 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Post by criddic3 »

cam wrote:I wonder what criddic's answer to the radio commentator I heard yesterday would be when he told us that " the US, not able to win the war militarily, will lose it on the home front as Middle-Eastern countries sqeeze it dry with high oil prices."
Funny, because we are winning militarily.
"Because here’s the thing about life: There’s no accounting for what fate will deal you. Some days when you need a hand. There are other days when we’re called to lend a hand." -- President Joe Biden, 01/20/2021
Greg
Tenured
Posts: 3285
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: Greg
Contact:

Post by Greg »

Newt Gingrich has been caught on video saying it's too bad that Dubya didn't allow a few terrorist attacks to take place.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=d4lLLxbbOf0
Post Reply

Return to “Current Events”